Moriya Shrine | Source for all things Touhou

Rather simple.

1. Chen does not exist as an entity in the sensory world and may not be perceived by a subject except through the medium of a black screen.

1a. Sexual intercourse or fantasies thereof are a direct, irrefutable expression of a subject's adoration for the object, that being Chen, and thus serve to elevate the object's value, to confirm its beauty by act and to hypostatize in the explicit fantastical reproduction the valued aspects of a character within the subject and to reinforce them as such, and if not for its extrasensory aspects of personality, then for its immediate form.

2. FUMOs are representations of characters; Personality and characteristic attributes in a simplified and deliberately cute manner manifest.

2a. The violation of an object is a direct denial and destruction of the spatial, memetic or metaphysical aspects of the represented thing in itself / archetype in the mind of the subject and also externalized as the violated sits before him.

2b. To defile something in this way or even excessively delving into such fantasies creates a toxic, corrupting impulse within the psyche of the subject that aims to grow and reproduce, eventually, if not given pause by the other elements of it, overwhelming the self and causing psychopathy. Plato talks about this and its regularly seen in homocidal personality disorders that begin with the abuse of animals, which are in the direct manifestation of nature's will something intrinsically innocent and beautiful.

3. Following from 1a. and 2., sexual intercourse or such fantasies with the fictional character or its FUMO is not something I despise. You might find it disagreeable, you might even frown at the prospect and would rather not be exposed to such an act or the person committing it (I would admittedly also be loathe to be exposed to material pertaining to the latter), but it's not something that goes against the Thing one would call "Chen" or the concept of (its) beauty.

4. You're falsely quivocating the "crime" of Phantasy to the destruction of a thing of beauty - two acts that are within entirely different hierarchical substrates of value.

5. I am entirely unconcerned about "ships" and such, but about beauty and the elevation and total supremacy of the beautiful, grand and higher forms over the lowly chthonic and slithering consuming impulses of the reptilian part of the hueman. This is my moral framework and I do not stray from it.

Also, you might want to start capitalizating the start of a sentence.

what about violent rape fantasies on chen then? at what point along the vanilla to guro spectrum does it stop being le good "confirmation of beauty" and start being "psychopathy causing?"